What Just Happened Here?

A  very well-written, well-put, and interesting take on what’s been going on with our illustrious president-elect lo these last many months here in the U-S-of-A.  Without using the now-too-common vitriol that is more than abundant in our dialog lately, Mr. Schram puts this situation into a good perspective:  Entitled:  “Trump works a tough post-campaign crowd.”  (By the way, the bold words are done by me for emphasis.)

from: The Salem News, written by Martin Schram

The in-depth, inside battle for the heart and mainly the mind of President-elect Donald Trump has been underway ever since 3 a.m. on the morning after Election Night — and so far we’ve discovered one possibly hopeful revelation.

It is that I have just used a wrong word: depth.

At an on-the-record luncheon at The New York Times on Tuesday, the president-elect backed away from several hard-line and seemingly deeply held right-wing positions he had declared when he was wooing campaign crowds. Trump expressed surprising acceptance of positions that, just weeks ago, he’d loved to denounce and even ridicule.

The biggest news story most of the media focused on from Trump’s lunch at the Times was that he now has no intention of pursuing an investigation of his defeated Democratic opponent, whom he had derided as “Crooked Hillary” Clinton while his crowds chanted “Lock her up!”

But the luncheon also produced significant shifts on two of the issues that will define whether America will pursue its role of global leadership during the Trump presidency.

Consider what Trump said Tuesday about waterboarding and other forms of torture as tools for interrogating terrorist suspects. And as you consider what Trump said, remember that Trump’s campaign position was that the United States should permit waterboarding and even more severe forms of torture during interrogations.

Asked about waterboarding and other forms of torture, Trump began by citing his recent meeting with retired Marine Gen. James Mattis, who, Trump volunteered, is being “seriously, seriously considered for defense secretary.”

“I said, ‘What do you think of waterboarding?’” Trump said. “He said — I was surprised — he said, ‘I’ve never found it to be useful.’ He said, ‘I’ve always found, give me a pack of cigarettes and a couple of beers and I do better with that than I do with torture.’ And I was very impressed by that answer. I was surprised, because he’s known as being like the toughest guy. … You know he’s known as Mad Dog Mattis, right? … I thought he’d say ‘It’s phenomenal, don’t lose it.’

Trump said that alone hasn’t changed his mind, but he made clear that he’s now reconsidering all that he once assumed was right about waterboarding and terrorist interrogation. Waterboarding is illegal according to international law. And many tough-minded military leaders strongly opposed its use as contrary to our nation’s values.

Trump has famously ignored Sen. John McCain’s guidance on that and even called McCain a “loser” because he was captured during the Vietnam War in which Trump never served. But when a general named “Mad Dog” opposes it, well, that impressed Trump.

Now consider Trump’s post-election enlightenment on climate change. He has a long history of calling scientific evidence of human activity causing climate change a “hoax.” PolitiFact has documented that on Dec. 30, 2015, at Hilton Head, South Carolina, Trump told a rally: “Obama’s talking about all of this with the global warming and … a lot of it’s a hoax. It’s a hoax.” And on Sept. 24, 2015, on CNN’s “New Day,” Trump said: “I don’t believe in climate change.”

But when he was asked Tuesday if he believed human activity is connected to climate change, Trump took a different tack: “I absolutely have an open mind. I will tell you this: Clean air is vitally important. Clean water, crystal clean water is vitally important. … I think right now … well, I think there is some connectivity. There is some, something. It depends on how much.”

But then, in the same breath, he spoke of his concern that efforts to curb pollution will harm already-beleaguered companies. “It also depends on how much it’s going to cost our companies,” Trump added. “You have to understand, our companies are noncompetitive right now. … (W)e’ve lost 70,000 factories since W. Bush.”

Now, Trump added, he’s not sure what he thinks about what, if anything, America should pursue to combat climate change. “I’m going to be studying that very hard,” he said.

No doubt, now that he has run and won, Trump will begin doing the sort of studying most candidates do before they start campaigning and making policy pronouncements and promises. And we know one thing more about Trump: he craves adoration. Especially adoration from every audience, every day. It shapes everything he says and does.

He ended his visit by telling his hosts, whom he famously loved to publicly hate and denounce as rally crowds cheered him on: “The Times is … a great, great American jewel. A world jewel. And I hope we can all get along. We’re looking for the same thing, and I hope we can all get along well.”

And so we must wonder: Was Trump really telling it like it is as he executed his policy wheelies? Or was he just telling his liberal audience du jour what he thought it wanted to hear?


Of course, we all know by now (IF we’ve been paying any attention to this whole year and a half of campaigning) that the truth is in the last sentence above… our soon-to-be president was just telling people, whatever groups of people he happened to have in front of him, what he was probably TOLD by his handlers what they wanted to hear.  Anything, as long as it riled them into a frenzy, getting the blood pressures all up in the danger range, and then moving on to another demographic where something different might go over well.  Whatever they wanted to hear in order for them to adore him.  This whole last 18 months was all about the Adoration of Donald John Trump.  Period.  

If you have some free time, look up online Mr. T.Rump’s astrological chart/predictions.  I won’t spoil it, but they are very interesting, indeed, for what it’s worth.  We are in for a bumpy ride, my friends.  Make sure your seat belt is securely fastened!

Cheers,

Bex & Co.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to What Just Happened Here?

  1. Sandy from Chicago says:

    Interesting article. I can’t really see Trump doing much studying before making policy decisions though. He does things more by his gut feelings. That’s why with the cabinet interviews he has Pence and some of his children there for input & feedback. With the exception of Bannon, it’s been interesting to see him appointing traditional Republicans or donors to key positions in his Cabinet. I don’t see much draining of the swamp. If he goes for Romney as his secretary of state, which would be reassuring to many in Washington, I wonder how his supporters will feel? He definitely wants adulation. If he doesn’t get attention or if he receives criticism, he heads straight for Twitter.

    Like

  2. blb1 says:

    Someone else linked to that article and I just can’t bare reading it again Bex. I watch very little news now. Don’t know what I will do for the next 4 yrs. I’ve seen all the Hallmark movies. 🙂 On FB I scroll right past all posts about him and keep wondering why a recount of votes, it was the electrocute (yeah I did that on purpose) college that brought him to us.

    Like

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s